Network latency refers to the delay when data is transmitted over a network. In other words, it’s the time a data packet takes to travel from one point to another in a network.
In many digital applications, especially those related to real-time communications such as online gaming or video conferencing, low network latency is crucial to ensure a smooth and responsive experience.
Various factors can affect internet destinations’ latency, so it’s not strictly related to the destination type. However, generally speaking, you might see higher latencies when accessing destinations that are:
Remember that these are general tendencies, and there can be numerous exceptions based on specific cases and the quality of the network infrastructure involved.
The SFTP (SSH File Transfer Protocol) securely transfers files over a network. Based on the SSH (Secure Shell) protocol, it provides the same level of security for file transfers. SSH encrypts all the data transferred, preventing clear text from transmitting over a network.
Network latency can significantly impact the performance of the SFTP protocol, especially when transferring a large number of small files.
SFTP transfers files in packets. For each packet sent, it waits for an acknowledgement from the receiving end before sending the next one. This is called a “round-trip time” (RTT). If the network latency is high, each RTT will take longer, which can significantly slow down the overall transfer speed. This issue can be more pronounced when dealing with many small files, as each requires a separate setup and teardown phase, increasing the total number of RTTs.
Suppose you’re transferring a few large files. In that case, the impact of network latency on SFTP performance might be less noticeable, as the time spent in the setup and teardown phases is relatively small compared to the time spent transmitting the file data. However, the latency can still affect the throughput, particularly if the TCP window size (the amount of data in transit before an acknowledgement is required) is small relative to the latency.
One way to mitigate the impact of latency on SFTP performance is by using SFTP clients that support pipelining or parallel transfers. Pipelining allows the client to send multiple read or write requests to the server before waiting for the response, effectively increasing the TCP window size. Parallel transfers involve transferring multiple files simultaneously, which helps keep the network pipeline filled and better utilize the available bandwidth.
However, these techniques can only help to a certain extent and high latency can still significantly impact SFTP performance. Suppose latency is a persistent issue and is seriously affecting transfer speeds. In that case, it might be necessary to try other solutions, such as setting up a local server or using a content delivery network (CDN) to bring the data closer to its destination.
Remember, the reliability of the network connection also plays a role alongside latency. Even if the latency is low, a network with high packet loss can still lead to poor SFTP performance. This is because SFTP relies on TCP, which requires the retransmission of any packets lost during the transfer, further slowing down the process.
Also, remember that while SFTP provides a secure way to transfer files, encryption and decryption can add additional overhead, especially when transferring many small files. So, suppose security isn’t a primary concern, and you’re dealing with significant latency issues. In that case, other file transfer protocols that may be less sensitive to high-latency environments might be worth considering.
However, it’s important to note that these protocols may offer a different security level than SFTP. So, the protocol choice should be based on a balance between security needs and performance requirements.
Consider your network environment’s specific needs and circumstances, as the most effective solution can often depend on various factors.